>>> Also include m. at least for performance issue in VFP7 :
>>
>>Hi Cetin,
>>Can you tell me what sort of performance issue is involved with the "m."?
>>
>>Thanks
>
>If you don't include m. in for loops VFP7 is slower than previous versions (documented somewhere).
>Cetin

Hi Cetin,


I started another thread 647967to ask more about this, and people over there seem to say that using the m. is slower (someone even said 1/3). But Craig ran a test that seemed to indicate that using the m. in a for loop was negligently slower.
Now I'm really interested in this subject.