>>>>Hi Sergey,
>>>>
>>>>In message id 648030 Cetin says:
>>>>"If you don't include m. in for loops VFP7 is slower than previous versions (documented somewhere)."
>>>>Do you know anything about this?
>>>>
>>>Nope, but there's a result of my test in VFP7 SP1 with 5,000,000 iterations on P III 1Gz

>>>  a = 1    - 2.694 sec
>>>m.a = 1    - 2.741 sec
>>>

As you can see the difference is negligible.
>>
>>Try something different:
>>
>>ab=ba && Slow according Cetin
>>ab=m.ba && Should be the winner
>>m.ab=m.ba && Should be similar to the above
>>
>>I don't have VFP7, so can not test...
>
>Not really according to me :) Anyway I just sent a test case I could defend it as 'acoording to me' (in originating thread) :)
>Cetin

BTW the tests I could see saying not using m. is faster ignore the fact in fox almost all the time there might be a table in use :)
Cetin