Yes, it now makes sense! To continue my saga...since the result can contain multiple records with the same field name, I want to append my result so that one record contains each unique field name along with all table names (say, up to ten) containing the field.

I'm thinking an array has to be created containing all table names for each unique field name. My result then has to be appended to add additional columns for the table names. Does this sound like I'm on the right track?

Thanks.