>>>>Cetin,
>>>>
>>>>>I'd also love a better grid. But I object this saying "cumbersome, complex, problematic and featureless is VFP's grid class".
>>>>
>>>>Humm... you object the whole sentence or one or two adjectives? As far as I know you are one of the masters of the grid ;)
>>>>
>>>>Fernando
>>>
>>>I objected 'cumbersome','complex','problematic','FEATURELESS' keywords :)
>>>Thanks for your kindness. Honestly I worked with other grids as well (MS ActiveX ones + .Net's). None was total replacer of VFP's. All have better parts and weaknesses.
>>>Cetin
>>
>>I have not let the idea of a book covering grids die. Currently I am involved in the last beta test of our new semi-VFP enterprise software. After the full launch in July I will begin work in earnest. My question to you is...Would you contribute? I have been told by many that you are a master of grids. What I am thinking for the context of the book is a combo of cookbook / this-is-why-it-is. Based primarily on a search of postings/solutions from the participants here at UT.
>>
>>Matthew
>
>They're lying :) I'd try to contribute but never liked to tie myself with promises. Another obstacle is some of my grid things are part of commercial class (FoxyClasses).
>Cetin

What I would like to see from those like yourself, are answers to why it does it that way. I certainly would not want you to in any way compromise your commercial product, we all like to make money !), and I respect that folks like you and the other major players have not much time on your hands. I would work at making participation an easy thing to do, and keep it matched to your schedule. Thanks.