>>Says you. If you don't want to (which is 99.9% of everyone I know, even you), does it even matter if you can?
>No. Says the MS EULA. You should expand the range of your friendships. Gosh. Gee... outlawing free speech. Does it matter? You are telling me that if I were your friend and you knew from personal experience that a product I was planing to purchase was defective, you wouldn't bother to tell me about it? SUV rollovers, phen-phen, a buggy software app? Nice friend.

I don't think we're talking about the same thing here. We're talking about your claim that the ability to change the source code precludes wanting to change the source code. Thats not exactly correct.

>>I suppose you CAN twist that around and say "If you can't, does it matter what you want?", but I'm not a fan of spin-doctoring.
>No, you are way beyond being a fan. You are a master at it, and at self deception.

Considering you just addressed my questions in a completely different context than they were asked, we shoudl decide who gets to be the kettle and who gets to be the pot? I got dibs on the kettle.

>You don't follow legal proceedings do you?

Yes I do. That doesn't change the defintion of the word. Has it crossed your mind that the courts are not infallible? Especially rulings made by biased, ignorant judges like Mr. Jackson?