>>I don't know of such a list here on UT. Have I missed that too?
>>I would realy like to hear how a .CDX that will shrink when run using REINDEX and VFP6 SP5 and does not shrink running REINDEX in VFP7 SP1 is a "by design" happening.
>
>Jim;
>
>I would classify bugs as "by design". In that case nothing should be done about them. We must follow the logic. :)

Ahhhh... that's what I've been missing! I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...I will comply...



>
>Tom