>SNIP
>
>George,
>
>You say "
The problem here, and what I strongly object to, is that this sort of trash is counter-productive, and, ultimately may be harmful to the community as a whole.".
>
>It is you who has chosen to read it as you have. I cannot be much clearer than I have been, and if you continue to say that I didn't do things (which I most certainly did) then maybe you need read again and again until it does sink in.
Point me to your proof.
>I see your trite tripe as the "trash" in this whole discussion. I agree that such talk is counter-productive. So I will end, my point being as clear in my mind as it is possible to make it and you being not the least bit willing to see it.
>
Where's the proof that REINDEX causes fragmentation, Jim? Size alone proves nothing. You have the gall to start a thread like, showing nothing, zip, nada as proof, yet you call my post to you "trite tripe"? Don't think so. You opened your mouth, so "show me the proof".
George
Ubi caritas et amor, deus ibi est