We'll just have to wait and see <g>!
>Hi Mike,
>After a power outage, the PK sync may be the least of your worries :-) I assume the incremented key would be written to the header first, then the record.
>
>Great to meet you in KC at Essential Fox. Thanks for you news gathering efforts.
>
>>Hi Charlie
>>
>>I think I'd prefer to live with having to occasionally synchronize the PK table against the actual tables. I assume the table header will be used for storage of the last generated PK. During a power outage, it will still be possible for the last generated key to become out of sync with the last actual key. So there will be a need to synchronize the two.
>>