Daniel,
>Doug,
>
>> Exactly! I don't think that anyone will be forced to use the VFP
>> (AutoIncrement) version. Shoot.. I'd be surprised if you won't be able to
>> override it with your own.
>
>I never hinted that we would be forced to use it.. My point was my friends
>and I will not upgrade to VFP8 if the major improvements are on that level.
Ahh.. Ok.. Well, as Ken has said there are other features not yet made public. I'd wait and see before making that kind of decision.
>
>I still use Office '97 at home because I don't see any compelling reason to
>upgrade to Office 2000 or 2002 at this time. Sure they have more features
>but I need a few hundred bucks in my bank account more than I need these
>extra features.
Right.. I understand your reasoning. In our case we're still distributing VFP 6 runtimes. We'll go to v7 shortly but not until we're ready to switch everyone over... Since we control both sides it's kind of up to us. Shortly we'll want some of the new v7 features so that's probably when we'll do the field upgrades. The back end server is all v7 now but since we're squirting data over the Internet we're cool... Essentially a real-life upgrade-as-I-go scenario. <s>
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.