>>>Yep. It's reference to the article #739 not FAQ #739.
>>
>>I see ... do you happen to know how I could put a reference to the FAQ article in a message?
>>
>>Armin
>
>FAQ #8019. :)

Ok :) I always thought the references were distinguished by the amount of digits, which is oviously wrong. So I shouldn't write FAQ article, right? ;-) UT's many features are sometimes still like a riddle to me <g>.

Thanks,
Armin