David,

Not at all, though it may well turn out that it should have been < s >.

A difference between VFP6SP5 and VFP7SP1 has been observed and reported as a "bug" in the absence of information (official) to the contrary.

Should MS respond that this is "by design", then by all means some might call it an "improvement". Personally, I would call it a change worthy of documenting in the SP1 release notes.



>Jim,
>
>So the original title of your other thread should have been:
>
>Cool Improvement: VFP7 SP1 CDX files no longer bloat during record insertion
>
>>

>>VFP Version     CDX size after writing  CDX size after REINDEX  difference
>>VFP7SP1               88,113,152               88,145,920           +32,768
>>VFP6SP5               67,280,896               45,715,968       -21,564,828
>>