>Here you go.... Investment one is in Fox. Investment two is in dotNET.
>
>I contend there is zero opportunity cost in passing up an investment in Fox > for an investment in dotNET. I contend there is little to no marginal >tility in Fox-related investments as far as training, R & D, etc.

What if dotNET fails? Or, what if dotNET does not become stable for a few years? During the time a devloper was learning dotNET, they could have been learning VFP/Web Connection. VFP/Web Connection works now. How is that zero opportunity costs?

>Therefore, zero opportunity cost is possible. i.e., I give up nothing in Fox if I invest in dotNET.

>Now, if you compare dotNET to Java, maybe there is opp cost there.. But then again, that was not my argument...
>
>BTW, anybody can regurgitate a textbook definition of opportunity cost and present it as his own thought....< s >.

Apparently.