>
If you've not had luck submitting Fox articles to major publications, this may say more about you and the sort of articles you write than it says about Fox.
>

I spend my time writing about .NET..< bg >... There is nothing new or intriguing about Fox to write about. My track record of articles is pretty good (50+). And if I recall correctly, you gave my ADO article a decent review...



>
Another consideration is Fox developers, by and large, don't submit many articles for publication outside our circle.
<

Because that is the only place that has interest.

<
Again, to extrapolate this into the wider doomsday conclusion that you're always touting is again incorrect, but it fits rather well into your Modus Operandi.
>

And your overly-optimistic stance is not based on reality...

>
So in short, I say bullshit to most of your self-serving rationales and conclusions.
>

Most, but not all... Say what you will, but this much is true...if what I am saying is *that* unreasonable, I think certain folks would be up here to correct the record.