>
The whole basis of what you've been saying is that you are a messenger for a story nobody wants to hear.
<

That could be true. Of course wanting to and needing to are different things. FWIW, the point has been made.

<
More accurately, you are expressing your own ideas based on your own observaions and conclusions.
>

Your quick... for this is what I usually do, come up with orginal thoughts..



>
Yet you persist with implications that you are clairvoyant, or enlightened, or otherwise privy to information not disclosed to others, and you use this to bolster your arguments. That's 100% bullshit. Express opinions, fine, but invoke "books written long ago" by "people other than myself" and that you are "just a messenger", well, that's just rich reverie.
>

Then lets just wait and see... FWIW, 3.50 + what you preach would buy a pack of Camels. i.e., I think what you are preaching is BS too, so that makes us even...


>
I think everyone would be better served if you simply just kept things real and stopped making stuff up (fabricating).
>

I am about as real as it gets Steve... Maybe you should keep it real.


>
Absolutely anything is possible in the future. I wouldn't be surprised if either the very best or the very worse forecasts for VFP were to come to pass. Or anything in between.
>

Right.....


>
California will fall into the sea, or it won't, or something in between. That's the extent of my knowledge of the matter, and I suspect that's the equivalent extent of your knowledge about the future of VFP.
>

Again, we shall see....


>Good luck with the dot net articles.


Thanks...I think...