>>>I got tickets for Thursday night (it open here in Miami Thursday). I also hope it's better than the last one. Please no more "Immaculate Conceptions" George. :)
>>
>>I still have to see Episode 1. What was wrong about the "Immaculate Conception" part?
>>
>>Hilmar.
>
>Drool!
>
>"Imacculate conception", know in biology as parthenogenic birth, can only result in a female birth due to the lack of male chromosomes. Male progenity requires a 'father' or a miracle.
>JLK
Thanks. OK, that makes sense. Although, the miracle is said to have happened already in the past... But I don't know how they treated the subject in the movie - as I said, I didn't see it yet. Also, I understand that a purported repetition of the miracle would be sacrilegous to many Christians.
So what basically happened in the movie was a female giving birth to a male, and without a father?
Hilmar.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
