>>>Choosing a langauge that is more likely than not to be on an approved list is not a wise move IMO. This is but one of many reasons.
>>What are the others?
>Besides Fox??? Does it matter? As long as Fox is barred, who cares? Unless of course, you think there is safety in numbers.

You said it was "one of many reasons". What are the other reasons, besides the declining usage? You keep saying VB.NET can do evrything C# can do. What can't VFP do that those two can?

>One rational interpretion of this is that you advocate VFP developers move to C#. I know you are not saying that. Still, you didn't qualify it. You listed VFP, VB, and c#, and of the three, you picked C#.

I advocate all .NET developers to make sure they're famailar with C#. Why? Because it will be much more beneficial to companies to standardize on a language, and if the choice is between C#, VB.NET, and VFP, C# is easier to standardize on because its a standard and very similar to other industry standards.

>I said it was not my primary argument, but it is one of many factors to consider.

And the others are?