>
http://news.com.com/2010-1076-915523.html?tag=fd_nc_1>
>"My spam is important to me. In this new age of the Internet, I need the information and opportunities that e-mail marketing provides."
>
>"So what's the big deal about spam? I think a few well-meaning but uninformed politicians and advocacy groups have decided what's good for us."
>
>What an idiot. Its peices like this that make you wish for the days when geeky stuff was only talked about by geeks.
Probably the guy got paid a lot of money to say that. Remember there is a big industry behind the spam. And politicians are under pressure to continue allowing spam.
According to a recent piece of news, the number of messages doubled in the last five months. This may be good news, in a way: if the problem gets so out of proportion that politicians see themselves forced to do something about it...
However, any solution has to be world-wide in scope, to be really effective. For instance, if they forbid spam in the US, spammers will relocate to Bolivia, for instance, and send from here.
Hilmar.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)