>Denis..
>
>There are lots and have been lots of alter-egos up here. There are many concerned with their position or believe that touting the party line somewho shores up their position and protects their turf. The irony is that there is no more turf to protect...
>
>Speaking my mind has not always served me well. And for the folks here that get ticked off, that is something I can afford since the opinions of those that matter, have not told me to back off....
>
>Remember, if I said anything that was off-base, the powers that be would have told me to back off. To date, that phone call has not been received.
>
>I suspect the whiners and complainers have finally realized that for a long time, they have been P***ing in the wind...

I think I met some of those guys. The problem is they have no sense of wind direction! :)



>
>
>
>
>>It's not really Joe Bob that I miss but the idea that we could have a peudonym that could be used by everybody to say the real things.
>>
>>I read controversial threads and many of those that protect Microsoft look like they have a moral obligation to protect it.
>>
>>Whether they have friends that work for MS, or they are MVPs that wants to keep the good relations within MS, or have other businesses involving them with MS. Anyway you get my idea. I don't accuse anyone here it's just that I'm having difficulties to believe them 100%.
>>
>>Some of them looks like politicians. You don't really want to know what I think of politicians :-D
>>
>>You see when I make a negative comment or ask tough questions (that could or could not be answered) I know that this won't change a thing with my relation with MS because I don't have one ;-) other than buying many of their stuff over the years. (Speakers, mouse, software...)
>>
>>I'm sure some of those defenders could be pi**ed off by some things. A pseudonym could be used to express their real sentiments.
>>
>>What about one or a couple pseudonyms that could reflect the essence of threads created by the person using that acronym?