>>Any plans to support NNTP with the UT? I'm new to the UT and find it a bit frustrating to check various newgroups one way and a different way w/ the UT.
>
>One of the reasons to have UT is to benefit of a far more advance engine than NNTP. So, we're not going backward.

Thanks for the reply. It just goes to show how little I actually knew was available here. Thanks,

Mark