>Jim,
>
>No, you did not waste my time. BTW, that was one hell of a thread. I think I weened enough information to help me make this situation tolerable. And, yes, your assumption was correct. Once corrupted, the table just did not get updated on inserts (and no error is reported). VERY unnerving situation.
>
>Thanks again for your help.

You're most welcome, Bob.

And it is an unnerving situation that, I'm sure we all hope, gets fixed in the next version.

Cheers