I agree with you absolutely.

Firstly. Why Microsoft spread their "Microsoft Internet Explorer" logo? And why not "Microsoft Visual FoxPro" logo?

Secondly. In many countries (for example in Russia) lighting sign mean danger. What dangerous is in FoxPro? I think nothing, because it is only the best MS tool for developers. Logo has to be friendlier.

Thirdly. It would be great if Ken spend some money from VFP advertisement budget for professional developing as minimum as three type of VFP logo:

- 88*31 pixel GIF file with animation (for web)
- 88*31 pixel GIF file without animation (for web)
- something bigger (for application use)

Sorry if I wrote something wrong, but I think it is important part of the advertisement company...

>While the logo does look professional, its not something I'll use. I don't associate the picture of the fox with VFP. It's also bigger than I would like. The small "FrontPage" or "SQL Server" logos that you see on some web sites is better suited.