>10 bucks says the institute is funded by Microsoft. :)

Why is it that anytime anything that goes against open source is said, this comment is made?

>That said, it may be too late. Take a look at this: http://salon.com/tech/wire/2002/05/30/linux/index.html.
>
>Also I think open source is more secure. You have the code. You can change it. The NSA did this with Linux. Anyone here gonna tell me that any version of Windows is secure?

I'm not going to comment one way or the other on which is more secure. I've been down that path and don't want to do it again. There is lots published that is pro-open source and not much anti-open source. That's why I posted the link.