General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Hi Moises.
I friend of mine did a program as below and complains
scan is too low.
He as 3,000,000 records
He wonder if the struct is correct or is there a better way
to do that.
Andy and I recently found that if you are scanning a large table-buffered cursor with pending changes, the SCAN grinds to a halt. We suspect that it is a memory management issue.
If you are using table buffering, get rid of the pending changes. That should speed things up.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only