>>Great job Jim! I'm so glad you responded to it. I intended to myself tonight. I actually found the site today by accident doing a search on google. Out of curiosity, I clicked on the link. Needless to say, I was rather surprised!
>>>Tracy
>>>
>>
>>As was I. I thought I handled it fairly well - up to the point I suggested he get his facts straight and suggested he introduce his lips to my dog's tail end - or something similar. Guess he got the message...
>>
>>UPDATE to the UPDATE: the page has been edited. Should have saved a copy of that puppy <s>
>
>
>Way to go Jim! It's interesting that, although he made of point of attempting to classify which development tools aren't "real" programming languages, he fails to mention which language they did use...
>
>
>Oh, here is a link to the cached version in Google...
>
>
>http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:goi_pdGeTTAC:www.mbfs.com/tbsdesc.asp+mbfs+akc&hl=en&ie=UTF8
>
>
>- Brian

Thanks for the link, Brian. Didn't realize that the Goggle "cache" would keep a history like that. I just use it for sites that have been taken off the air. I just checked again and the edited version was displayed. Must be some time expiration thing happening...

I also thought it telling that his 'real' programming language wasn't divulged. After his snappy repair of the site, I didn't have the nerve to ask <s>. After his abuse of FoxPro and Access, he probably didn't need the heat. My guess would be MASM - he is, after all, a REAL programmer.