>>All these other MS development languages need something else, where as VFP is complete. Which is maybe why VFP suffers some lack of press if you follow the reasoning that there really isnt any other high-end data intensive development tool out there for the PC MS Office-compatible market for VFP to compete with.
>
>Rox,
>
>You may want to try hiring some Visual Studio developers .

This is exactly the right response that we should have. One of the dangers of being so Pro-VFP, is that we sometimes use VFP for things it is not meant for either.

I've been working with Fox stuff for almost 10 years, and I still think it is one of the best tools out there. No, VFP is not complete as far as I'm concerned. VB and C still have an awful lot to offer to applications.

IMHO, I think we are going to start seeing more and more applications that are not centered around one language/technology. I also think that intranet application will become king, and Tahoe looks like it is positioning itself to better equip us for that.