SNIP
>
>Well, maybe this is for Toledo wish list? I agree that in VFP help (and not only) there are some orphan topics (not included in index and not included in see also links). Also there are many disconnected parts of information that can only be found by searching of specific term. But what about term difference then? For example: according to me (as a foreigner) the term may be "order", but some other guy (or gal) will say it "sequence".
>There is lot more to say, but I'll content myself by saying only the above comments.

Well my Toledo wish would be to have RELEASE actually release when the programmer issues RELEASE, regardless of other references hanging around. After all, it is MY program and if I am stupid enough to have a dangling reference that I later try to use then that attempt should simply fail with a 'object does not exist' type of message.
My second alternative would be to have the RELEASE command provide some feedback when it does NOT release as directed.

I agree that there are many unindexed/orphaned/missing-link topics in the VFP documentation, and I think that this is the place to bring these to the attention of MS.
My main focus is the Command Reference part because that is where I believe that MOST VFP users go to when they are unsure of something. As such, everything that is important about any entry there needs to be THERE. It is fine by me if it is elsewhere too.

Cheers