General information
Category:
COM/DCOM and OLE Automation
Yes, I've chosen the easy way. COM+ packaging seems to be unneeded overhead and complexity. I believe the Virtual Directories in High and Medium isolation are using JIT since they are using the MTS.exe stub for instanciation.
>That's where I get confused. What is the difference between setting application protection on virtual directory and putting DLL in a COM+ package? They both allow you to "unload" application without stopping web server. Do they both offer JIT?
>
>Maybe if I'm not using transactions or need to apply security directly to COM object, I can do without COM+?
>
>Someone needs point out the pro's and con's of both.
>
>Charlie
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only