Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Giving the three stars for itself
Message
 
À
24/06/2002 09:17:05
Information générale
Forum:
Level Extreme
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
00671405
Message ID:
00671626
Vues:
16
The person who posted the problem/solution is in the best position to know if an answer is valid. One thumb up would be an indication of resolution. Two thumbs are not needed unless it is those two guys on television reviewing the “movie of the week”! :) I notice those guys do not often agree. That is the problem with "solution by committee"!

If you must have "two thumbs" involved then one thumb up and one down will be for an "almost solution". Of course I am under the presumption that dumps = thumbs.

Tom

>>...After considering various answers, some helped to set him on the corrct path but NONE were themselves the answer. In order to 'close' the thread WITH THE FINAL ANSWER he writes the final message WITH THE RIGHT ANSWER. He thinks it would be valuable to be able to "mark" that as the correct answer so that future readers would have the benefit of seeing the mark to get the answer quickly. He feels that the 3-stars would do OK for this (no points required) but currently he has no way to put the 3 stars on the message.
>>
>>I agree with Claudio that being able to mark the correct (full) solution would be useful to all.
>
>I will let him confirm this statement. You may be right by mentioning it. However, someone else mentioned that it was mostly a two dumps up/two dumps down approach such as rating a message. So, those are two different things. So, I just want to make sure we all understand the same thing.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform