Tracy,

I think that security, while not the equivalent to the big boys, would be far more robust in a VFP 'server' environment.

By the way, in my wish for something along these lines I thought that it could be packaged/sold separately as long as cost was in line with existing VFP pricing/licensing.


>I like this idea. Of course, if it was implemented into the next version of VFP, then it would sure add to the benefits of using VFP! The only part missing is the additional size of data gained and the added security you receive in data backends like Oracle or SQL. I think if this were easily accomplished in vanilla VFP, then it could really be marketed-it would provide a native client-server environment with most of the processing being done on the server instead of the client and limit the bandwidth utilization.
>tracy
>
>>Jim:
>>I was thinking somewhat more but robust as in the ability to pass whole programs to be processed from the remote server in the same manner as one passes a SQL statement to Oracle, but your idea is germane to the concept I was attempting to convey.
>>...Art