>What he fails to realize is that the Pledge of Allegance could be read that way. Allah and Budah are gods. God is not a name, but a title. He is making a mistake commonly made by many Athiests.

I think the main argument is not as you are saying, but rather the no god/many god beliefs, at least that's what I read.

Not disagreeing with anyone on the pledge, or saying there a great many aetheists/multitheists in modern times (like Greek, Norse, Roman gods, etc), just that this is the better argument if one is arguing about the pledge. It does imply monotheism, no doubt about that.