>>Like Arnon said today, reusability is part of OOP, but existed before...
>
>Is that not a contractio in termis? In any case it strikes me
>that as statement it is definitely not object oriented.
>
Why shouldn't it be? You can use the same technology in different ways, can't you? Just because it's used in a different way, it doesn't mean you have to change its' name...
Alex
Alexandre Nobre
Alpha Bytes Computer Corp.
Did you know that there are innocent people dying in East Timor?
It helps if you do...
I suppose you don't need glasses if you're able to read this line
