Victor

When someone ask a question about a product, they usually want factual information, including what other users liked and did not like, and stating your views is fine. Had you stated the facts, i.e., that you had a pre-conceived idea about how a framework should look, feel, and behave, and you found ProMatrix to be antithetical to your expectations, and specified, with accuracy, what didn't work the way you wanted it to work, then we wouldn't have come out of the woodwork and climbed all over you.

Your complaints, however, were mostly opinion, expressed as fact, and quite incendiary in tone. There are thousands of satisfied VPM users, and those of us who really like the product will read with interest your analysis. If we see a point of value, we will even recommend a change to the authors. However, we will not tolerate a diatribe laced with fallacious information stated as fact.

I don’t have a problem with you liking MaxFrame, I have tried it, and it is a good product. I do have a problem with trashing another good product, simply because it doesn’t work the way you think it should.

Every experience is an opportunity to learn. We should all make the most of this one.