>>In THAT case, I would DEFINITELY get the names of the two MS consultants and provide them to Ken Levy so he can clarify and/or discuss this with them. It's always possible a corrected statement can be provided to your company by MSFT. It is my understanding that not all MSFT reps or consultants are educated on the capabilities and future of VFP and that needs to be rectified. Remember, they may specialize in an entirely different tool and just be uninformed about VFP. In order for Ken to do that successfully, he needs information from the business world (and us) when misinformation that degrades the opinion of VFP is provided from MSFT reps or consultants in the field.
>
>Yeah, I've already passed the names on to Ken as soon as I heard about it.
>
>>Also, I'm sorry that it appears that your attempt in garnering amunition via this forum to fight on behalf of VFP's use in the business world has resulted in 'what appears to be' personal attacks against yourself and your intentions.
>
>Hehe, I don't mind it, some of them have a point and some just don't want to here it over and over - neither do I, that's why I ask the community's advice.
>
>Some people don't like to be reminded of the continuing problem of mis-interpretation by people who can make decisions whether to or not use VFP as a development tool......
>
>Kev

Kevin;

Perhaps those who do not wish to read your message should not respond to it. I think that people that continue to respond to messages they do not want to see have a problem. A serious problem of a personal nature. :)

Tom