>I hereby suggest to provide a way to post updates to the magazine articles.
>
>I am thinking that several required corrections or additional information will result as feedback only after (hopefully) several hundred people read the articles in the UT Magazine.
>
>I suggest keeping the original articles untouched, but having a hyperlink to (possible) updates (at the end of each article). The updates might be edited by the original author or by the editors.
>
>Hilmar.

Looks like a good candidate for UT Task Tracker. :)