Well, I'm going out on a limb here John (Big sarcasm intended and big grin due to the personal attacks you receive here on the UT, but it's Friday so I'll risk it :o) and supporting you 100% in this statement. That's LIFE and that is how businesses prosper and continue to prosper in the future regardless of technological changes.
Tracy
>Business requirements should be what drives I/T. Unless an I/T solution is directly addressing a specific business challenge, it should not be undertaken. Also, ideal I/T solution specifications are generated independent of a specific technology.
>
>The sooner technology folks come to understand this reality, the incidence failed/death march projects will diminish.
>
>
>>>I would say there are more business implications than technical implications. And FWIW, the business implications are what normally do and should drive the decision...
>>>
>>
>>normally do -- yes
>>
>>and should -- only from a bean counter's or manager's point of view ;)
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"