>>I'm not sure I care.
>You better care if you are going to make the argument it is un-constitutional.
If being the key word. I don't really care what historical documents allow or do not allow when forming an opinion of my own.
>Also, why wasn't a const. convention convened to adopt a specific pledge that did not have the phrase "under God"?
Reconstruction ended in 1877. The two words in question were not added until 1954.
>Actually, one thought is that a bunch of folks slid this one by Eisenhower, that he really was not clued into the issue.
A president not conscious of his surroundings. Why is that not hard to believe.
>>Belief in the Almighty is a fairly concrete, and not accurate with respect to non-monotheists.
>Then they can choose to ignore. Or, begin the ground work for a const. amendment.
Or start electing better representitives.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement