>http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/6/27/184341
>http://news.crosswalk.com/partner/Article_Display_Page/0,,PTID74088|CHID194343|CIID1146392,00.html

There's nothing in these two links say the father claimed the little girl wasn't a Christian. Agreed?

>Ah, but for him to submit his case he had to demonstrate some sort of damage, as I understand the law.

This is probably where you problem is.

>He lied Mike. Regardless of anything else the whole case seems moot based solely on this fact.

Lol. "None of the details matter" Whatever, Doug. Quote NewsMax all you want.

>The woman is dead I presume as a result of the cyanide? No, the father would seem to be right as he would be able to demonstrate real damages.

Actually, they acted quickly and got her out of there before the physical damage began. Doesn't mean that damage was happening before that.