You're entitled to your opinion, Jess. I think that someone who constantly fabricates, who impersonates, who spews innuendo like JVP does, i.e. someone without ethics, really isn't due any slack cut.

Nonetheless I'm glad the loony-tunes entertainment analogy works for you. And despite what you believe, stakes matter.

Also don't kid yourself Jess, I have a solid handle of precisely who, and approximately what proportion of people at large, feel precisely the same way I do. If someone whose opinions I respect were to call me today and tell me I'm out of line and that JVP's past behavior is, in fact, ethical, then that would be a first.



**--** Steve



>Steve,
>
>JVP's stand and your's are very loud and clear to us. No repetition please... I think it is more unethical for a person to say unethical words.
>
>Difference in Point-Of-View is the right term Steve. Not malpractices. However, each of us have our own little malpractices and so please stay away with the "Holier than thou attitude".
>
>So what if I am just a garbage collector - as in "no" stakes at all? Problem with you Steve is that you do not even know if majority agree with your opinion or Point-Of-View.
>
>Another thing is, who can tell that you have the better and right opinion than him? None. So instead of you sticking to technical debates, so that we will learn from it, it turned out - to be like that of TOM and JERRY show. Why don't both of you accept the fact that Tom perfectly loves fish and Jerry perfectly loves cheese?
>
>:)