>>I think it is more a party of 1.
>>
>>I have no interest in fueling things that lead to spawning ancillary threads. I certainly don't have interest in providing "entertainment". I have opinions that in some way, clash with Steve in a personal way. Specifically how it clashes, I don't care. But something is there based on the way he has responded.
>
>Although you do not intentionally persue an argument, it happens anyway, and to most people that's entertainment. But it's not that you are arguing that is entertaining, it's the points you bring up in the arguments and seeing how strong the points can become during the course of the argument.
>
>>Of course, you do confirm that for most part that folks love this sort of thing. You are the first person to actually put in writing that you would not log on if you thought the thread was dead.
>
>I normally login to keep myself updated rather than seek help in FoxPro, and if there is a battle going on, I will make special effort to login.
>
>I'm pretty sure I don't speak just for myself.
>
>Kev

I don't think you do either, Kev.
While John and I disagree on some things, he has a very good at clearly elucidating his thoughts in writing, and he is throught provoking. Too bad his going to be a lawyer ;-) gr&D....(Sorry, John, I just couldn't resist!;-)
JLK