>I perceive two disconnected slogans that sound like "arguments"... until one examines and sees that you prove me right yet again.
>


Here is the deal: I have put out an opinions and a few theories along the way based on observations I have made. I have been reasonably detailed as to where these observations come from. My suggestion to you is to dispute what I have said by either showing that I am fabricating something or by misrepresenting something by only showing part of the story. If you can do that, great. If you can't, so be it. IAC, laying charges that I am a liar, obfuscator, or whatever does not do the job.

I think what I am stating here is fairly straight forward and in simple to read terms. I don't think it is unecessarily wordy or indirect.