>I think 4462 is a bigger number than 92....
>
>Based on what you show here, I will concede the point that the rates of decline are the same and perhaps better for VFP. Comparing the end result however, does it really matter?
>
>>The rate of decline argument is not a big hook to hang your hat on. Therefore, I will simply concede the point and instead, look at the end result.<<

It is not and all through this, I've realized there is little point in arguing this stuff. As I said in my initial reply, I simply don't care for endless arguing with little or no sight of conclusion.

But what is a big hook to hang my hat on is that I got you to concede the point, no matter how insignificant it was. Thank you! ;)