>>>You can achieve the same with USE ... AGAIN.
>>
>>Yes, but, I believe, it's much simplier by restoring the pointer. Also, with the number of occurences of the recursive loops, this would represent a lot of new alias to be opened.
>
>I was just trying to point out that it can be done in the "proper" way. <s>
>I think that the way you're doing it know is the simpliest and most efficient.

Yes, isolating the environment would be the best with your approach. But, for behind the scene manipulation, I believe the restoring of the pointer would do it.

However, I'll suggest it in the wish list. Or, at least, a parameter could be passed to the SCAN to specify the auto restoring of the pointer.