>>> Something better (in my opinion) comes along.
>>
>>What are you lacking in VFP?
>Minor functionalities - nothing I would switch over for. Perhaps:
>Provision to mimic the latest M$ GUI standards, rather than get the functionality one version later. Icons in menus is an example.
>Some cool OOP features - like being able to point the methods of group of objects to the method of one object (Delphi)
>Auto resizing of objects in a container (delphi)
>A richer set controls (Delphi - mre than you can shake a stick at)
>
>>

Do you think MS is reading this post?

>>>From previous threads, I understand that M$ incorporated FoxPro technology into SQL Server. Pity they stopped at that...
>>
>>Would you consider VFP/SQL as the way to go?
>Yes - where appropriate. I don't buy into in the finishing nail/sledgehammer approach.