Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
InfoWorld .Net articles
Message
 
To
09/08/2002 08:14:46
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00687905
Message ID:
00688146
Views:
32
>There's some very good articles on the future of .Net at
>
>http://www.infoworld.com/news/hnmsreport.html
>
>There's so much there I won't quote the highlights -- there's too much.
>
>Be sure to check out (for starters):
>
>"Microsoft Courts VB Faithful" at http://www.infoworld.com/articles/pl/xml/02/07/29/020729plvbdev.xml
>
>"A Language Divided" at http://www.infoworld.com/articles/pl/xml/02/07/29/020729plvbtrans.xml
>
>"Road To Managed Code" at http://www.infoworld.com/articles/ne/xml/02/08/05/020805necoderoad.xml
>
>"The Bully Is Back" at http://www.infoworld.com/articles/ne/xml/02/08/05/020805nenonnet.xml

From the last URL you mentioned:
" [Microsoft's] dalliance with open-source software (for example, BSD and Linux editions of the .Net platform) is self-serving. Microsoft risks little by allowing OSS ports of .Net. OSS hackers aren't going to create open-source versions of Exchange or SQL Server. "Better together" is Microsoft's OSS defense; the combined Microsoft server stack is .Net's back end. Worthwhile .Net enterprise software will expect most of that stack to be present, just as worthwhile Java enterprise programs require J2EE. Besides, pushing .Net to other platforms only creates a broader base for licensing."

I hope Micheal De Icaza (leader of the Linux MONO project) reads that sentence over and over and over until it soaks in....
He sure is wasting a lot of time and talent.

jlk
Nebraska Dept of Revenue
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform