Thanks Fernando. I hope that yours helps John to see what it is that I am driving at.

cheers


>>1) This was addressed to KenL, not to you. Yes, you have every "right" to reply, but it should also be most clear to you that your position on these matters is now extremely well known throughout the Universal Thread. There is no need for constant repetition of your view, save your own objectives.
>
>Agreed!
>
>>2) You are one of several who, on various topics, feels compelled to answer on behalf of Microsoft. This does us all a huge disservice!
>
>Complete agreement here, too.
>
>>PLEASE... we all know your position on the future/decline of VFP. Let others, and most especially Microsoft, express contrary or confirming views.
>
>Jim, add my PLEASE to yours, as well! JVP by doing so may make MS people feel they are not obligated to answer the message, some wise guy already did it (JVP is not the only one that talks "on behalf" of MS, though).
>
>Fernando