>>Is there a reasonable explanation for being inactive? Could it be due to thread such as "Decline of VFP" or even this thread? Or are there other logical explanations. Thank you again.
>
>No, you would need to be explained the history and evolution of FoxPro to explain this.

As a new programmer, when I was looking for a tool - I wan'nt evn aware that UT existed, nor did I seek any advice from anyone. My contacts with programmers was veryh limited. Yet, the tool I chose was VFP. The only thing that made me go VFP was my own understanding that VFP is THE tool for database development with networking capabilities.

Therefore, what puzzles me is, why do people perceive VFP differently. I do understand that FoxPro was at some point acquired by MS - and that by itself should have given VFP the clout it needs.

Any comments?