Have you no shame, Craig? You must think you're dealing with a bunch of idiots.

>I read the typo as "You should know that obtaining VFP via upgrade instead of MSDN Subscriptions is now way a vote for VFP at Microsoft."
>
>If purchasing an MSDN subscription did not help VFP, Ken would not be promoting MSDN like he is.
>
>
>>>
>>>MSDN Pro and higher levels include VFP 7.0, Visual Studio .NET, Visual Studio 6.0 (which includes VFP6, VB6, VisualInterdev, etc.), Windows versions, and other software. If someone needed VFP only, then MSDN may not be the best solution obviously. But most developers and companies some or all of these other products with VFP development. You should know that obtaining VFP via upgrade instead of MSDN Subscriptions is in now way a vote for VFP at Microsoft. Microsoft cares far more about how many VFP developers are using MSDN Subscriptions than via stand alone upgrades.
>>
>>Ken,
>>
>>I assume that was a typo, and you meant to say "You should know that obtaining VFP via upgrade instead of MSDN Subscriptions is in no way a vote for VFP at Microsoft." This sure sounds like a contradiction of your previous pronouncements on the subject.
>>
>>Mike