>>>>Gee, it seems that you snipped out the text that was my point, which was a direct reply to Ken's question asking me to substantiate my claim that he had contradicted his previous statements.
>>What makes you think I haven't made the decision about upgrading for myself?
>
>If you have, then why do you continue to bitch, with statements like "What you mean to say is that Microsoft would greatly prefer to pressure us into purchasing a larger bundle of software than we thought we wanted."?
>
>It's pretty easy to figure out whether or not MSDN is what you want or not. I will help you. Do you plan on using .NET? Then it's a good idea? SQL Server? Then it's a good idea. Do you anticipate using a bunch of testing on a bunch of different versions of Windows? Then it's a good idea.
>
>Do you use just VFP? Then it's not a good idea.
>
>How MS is pressuring you into this decision, I have no clue.

Want a ride on the clue-train?
http://k12os.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=17&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
This is one of many examples of 'pressure'....
JLK



>
>> I'm not bitching at Ken, just depriving him of the luxury of making false and misleading statements that go unchallenged.
>
>Yeah, I know. You don't mean to beat up on Ken, but...
>
>> I would ask you, what is your point, but frankly, I don't think I'm interested.
>
>No point is pretty simple: Upgrade, don't upgrade, get MSDN, don't get MSDN, switch over to Java, use Visual Turbo Cobol, whatever. Just stop your whining, and get off Ken's back. Oh, and wear a cup.