Hmmm ... looks like I'm gonna have to play around with this some ... so, you're saying that you *can* use the same method name?
~~Bonnie
>>But because you still have to call the WebService method with a different name, it doesn't seem overloaded to the user of the WebService.
>
>Hi, Bonnie.
>
>Well, the Overloaded method works... the main difference from what Cathi said is that I used
, instead of "MethodName".
>
>From the user point of view, I just call the same method name, just like any other overloaded method, and then, the "messaging" for the object is routed by the WSDL file (that´s what I understood). :)
