Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
DBase III problems
Message
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
FoxPro 2.x
Divers
Thread ID:
00692301
Message ID:
00692556
Vues:
24
>>Not EXEs for sure. However, there was the ability to create applications without having FoxBASE+ installed. You could, compile files (the ended up the the extension FOX) using the FOXPCOMP compiler and run them use FOXPRUN. The compiler produced threaded p-code.
>>
>
>I knew there was some kind of psuedo-compiler, but couldn't remember how that worked. Thanks for the reminder. I knew there weren't EXEs, though.

Would you believe I still have these hanging around?< g >

Actually, it's not that much different from what we have had since a EXE compiler was available. For example, an APP file isn't different from an EXE except that it doesn't contain the header information needed to start it. You could compile all your modules in FoxBASE+ into a single file, much like an APP is to-day.
George

Ubi caritas et amor, deus ibi est
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform